If more applications would support webp it will get more populair. The jpg's are created in a custom Affinity Photo export preset and unfortunately the webp's are converted in XnConvert! Just the plain HTML you see here is one image of a Bootstrap image slider or you could use this code for an image header on any device including portrait mode on a mobile phone: Hi of course they can and you don't need the fancy JavaScript like I use or imagekit/cloudinary. And the more visitors our servers can serve. They smaller and faster pages we can serve, the later we cross the red line. We are concerned about extreme load and peaks where we are forced to switch to queue systems or text-only emergency pages. We are not concerned about the global bandwidth consumption. Makes it even more important to understand the big picture. Like hospitals treating both COVID and cancer patients where remedies for both issues are identified and prioritized. If Cisco's projections published in November of 2018 are reasonably accurate, two years from now video content will account for about 80% of that.Ĭonsidering the impact of COVID-19 & the emergence of so many new video streaming services, it would not be much of a surprise if we are very close to that number before the end of this year. Seeing the big picture also means considering what kinds of internet content tend to use the most bandwidth. As of now we have to use smaller images or unbearable JPG quality to reduce the file sizes. PixelConverter is dedicated to helping you in converting pixels to any dimension and resizing images and photos professionally. We are btw not just dealing with page loading times - we have a significant number of visitors using mobile phones with bad connections and limited amounts of data. On our front page alone I can see we could reduce our bandwidth usage with 2.8TB per year if that was the entry page for all visits. I find it hard to believe I couldn't find support for a small file conversion and replacement change request if all browsers supported WebP if all browsers supported it. ![]() ![]() We have 50 mio visits a year - not a lot compared to Google - but shaving of 30% af the JPGs would make a huge difference. Then you'll see everyone adapt these size-optimized formats and initiatives with no bickering in sight. Until they day of the global bandwidth tax. Changing global habits (JPG) is unfortunately next to impossible. Pay the price in hardware investments and maintenance. Google invested in WebP and tried selling it because it matters if you live in a world of astronomic amounts of data. Imagine the amount of bandwidth consumed by these JPG's over the years - and then subtract 20% or more imagining WebP used instead.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |